Re: Running postgresql as a VMware ESx client - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Running postgresql as a VMware ESx client
Date
Msg-id 20081124112247.GA3861@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Running postgresql as a VMware ESx client  (Glen Eustace <geustace@godzone.net.nz>)
List pgsql-general
Glen Eustace escribió:
>
>> Generally speaking, virtualization allows you to take a bunch of low
>> powered servers and make them live in one big box saving money on
>> electricity and management.  Generally speaking, database sers are big
>> powerful boxes with lots of hard disks and gigs upon gigs of ram to
>> handle terabytes of data.  Those two things seem at odds to me.
>
> If one is handling databases with Terabytes of data and 1000s of
> connections, I would agree. We will be looking at 100s of Megabytes max
> and possible several hundred connections. A much smaller workload.

You're not gonna get "several hundred connections" on a resource-starved
machine.  Consider using a pooler (pgbouncer, pgpool), and reducing the
number of actual connections to the DB to a very low number of dozens.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres mail list traffic over time
Next
From: "Andrus"
Date:
Subject: Re: Returning schema name with table name