Re: TABLE command - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: TABLE command
Date
Msg-id 20081118153206.GB24041@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TABLE command  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: TABLE command  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm.  Given the current infrastructure for \h, the only way to do
>> that would be to make a separate ref page for WITH, which feels
>> like the wrong thing.  And the objection I have to TABLE is not the
>> code but the apparent need to give it its own ref page (as we
>> already did for VALUES, and I found that pretty ugly too).
>>
>> Is there a way to make all of these point at the SELECT ref page?
>
> I was looking into that and I figured using the \G expression in
> Perl  REs would be useful for this (to find multiple <refname>s).
> But this  was introduced in Perl 5.000, and we claim to support Perl
> 4 in  create_help.pl.  I recall that you Tom once arranged this to
> support  building on some old machines.  Is this still relevant?

No.  The last release of Perl 4 was in 1993.  People born since then
are probably hacking PostgreSQL right now.

> Or can someone advise on an alternative way to code this?

Leave Perl 4 support out. :)

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()?
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)