Re: Hardware HD choice... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Lutz Steinborn
Subject Re: Hardware HD choice...
Date
Msg-id 20081024092645.6e82eb2f.l.steinborn@4c-ag.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Hardware HD choice...  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-performance
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008 23:41:49 -0600
"Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com> wrote:
> > If you are doing batch inserts of data, and want to have reporting queries
> > concurrently running, make sure you have the pg_xlogs on a different disk
> > than the data/indexes.   2 drives RAID 1 for OS + xlogs works great (and
>
> From the OPs original post I'd guess that one big RAID 10 would serve
> him best, but yeah, you need to test to really see.

Has anybody a performance comparison for postgresql between the various RAID
levels ?

many thanks in advance

regards


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware HD choice...
Next
From: "Lionel"
Date:
Subject: Re: Hardware HD choice...