Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > It turns out you cannot EXPLAIN on CREATE TABLE AS, but it seems to work
> > fine if I extend the grammar as below:
>
> This seems to me to be something that will look like a wart, not a
> feature, from the user's point of view. You can't explain CREATE TABLE,
> but you can explain CREATE TABLE AS? It's just weird. It feels to me
> like exposing an implementation artifact.
As a user, I'm disagreeing about the weirdness of it. +1 for Peter's
initiative.
Regards,
--
dim
