Re: Annoying Reply-To - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: Annoying Reply-To
Date
Msg-id 200810231112.51595@hal.medialogik.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Annoying Reply-To  (Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Thursday 23 October 2008, Collin Kidder <adderd@kkmfg.com> wrote:
> You must use Reply All. You
> might say that that makes Thunderbird crippled but I see it more as a
> sign that nobody outside of a few fussy RFC worshipping types would ever
> want the behavior of the Postgre list. Yes, I'll have to live with the
> current behavior. Yes, it's an RFC standard. But, even after having
> heard the arguments I'm not convinced that this list's behavior is
> desirable. YMMV.

If it bugs you that much, just fix it for yourself.

:0 fr
* ^(To:|Cc:).*pgsql-general@postgresql.org.*
| /usr/bin/formail -I "Reply-To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org"

.. and eliminate any dupes:

:0 Whc: /home/$USER/.msgid.lock
|/usr/bin/formail -D 1024 /home/$USER/.msgid.cache

If your MUA doesn't work right, procmail is your friend.

--
Alan

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Import db from 8.1.3 to 8.3.1
Next
From: Angel Alvarez
Date:
Subject: Re: Annoying Reply-To