Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From David Fetter
Subject Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard
Date
Msg-id 20081015155714.GC18271@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #4465: GROUP BY is not to SQL standard  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 08:28:42PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tony Marston wrote:
> > I think your definition of "Feature T301 Functional Dependencies"
> > is extremely questionable. [et cetæra, ad nauseam]
>
> The issue is that Postgres is _more_ standards-compliant than MySQL,
> but Postgres is not 100% compliant either.  Is any database system
> 100% compliant?

No.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres database problem
Next
From: Rodriguez Fernando
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres database problem