Alexander Wirt [2008-10-10 7:02 +0200]:
> > > So a compromise I can live with is to put it back into unstable (or
> > > even just experimental), but never let it propagate to testing. Then
> > > backports.org can do mechanized backports of updates without being
> mechanized? No.
I meant it in the sense of "run a script to create a backport from a
particular testing/unstable release, as opposed to changing any source
package and upload it manually to backports.org". I would very much
assume that this is what currently happens with backports.org. At
least that's how we do backports in Ubuntu, with "backport-source.py
package_name source_release".
I didn't mean "automatically move every -8.2 unstable upload to
-backports", of course.
> Only if they are tested carefully.
Goes without saying.
> And I still don't like this.
--verbose ?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
