Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua Drake
Subject Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code
Date
Msg-id 20080903154336.1f0ea40c@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Cleanup of GUC units code  (Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 01:26:44 +0300
Hannu Krosing <hannu@krosing.net> wrote:

> So Andrews opinion was that Mb (meaning Mbit) is different from MB
> (for megabyte) and that if someone thinks that we define shared
> buffers in megabits can get confused and order wrong kind of network
> card ?

I was actually referring to:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-09/msg00206.php

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] In case module has wrong magic, report exact problem
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] GUC source file and line number]