Re: Vaccuum best practice: cronjob or autovaccuum? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Vaccuum best practice: cronjob or autovaccuum?
Date
Msg-id 20080828154800.GC8424@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vaccuum best practice: cronjob or autovaccuum?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
Responses Re: Vaccuum best practice: cronjob or autovaccuum?  (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>)
List pgsql-general
For the record:

Bill Moran escribió:

> The naptime at 600 is probably a bad idea.  If you only have one user
> database on this system, then it only gets investigated by autovac once
> every 40 minutes (template0 ... template1 ... postgres ... yourdb)
> Consider that autovac uses very little resources when it determines that
> it has no work to do.

Note that on 8.3, the meaning of naptime has changed -- it would be
effectively "check each database once every 10 minutes" if set at 600.
This was changed precisely because the previous semantics were difficult
to explain/use.

The OP is using 8.2 though so it doesn't apply here.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_dumpall problem when roles have default schemas
Next
From: Alan Hodgson
Date:
Subject: Re: Partitioned Tables - How/Can does slony handle it?