On Friday 22 August 2008 07:41:30 Decibel! wrote:
> If we're really worried about it we can have a GUC for a few versions
> that turns off named parameter assignment. But I don't think we
> should compromise the design on the theory that some folks might be
> using that as an operator *and* can't change their application to
> wrap it's use in ().
Even if that were a reasonable strategy, you can't use GUC parameters to alter
parser behavior.
