On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:18:24PM -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote:
> > I think it does -- I used to use the Latex output format for easy cut'n
> > pasting. ReST sounds like it serves the same purpose. If I had had to
> > use conversion to XML, it would have been rather painful.
>
> ReST is nice because it's almost plain text. In fact, a ReST document
> source can easily be read raw.
I presume by ReST you mean this:
http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html
Just guessing though. It's not referenced in wikipedia under that
acronym.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.
