Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf
Date
Msg-id 200808192139.41408.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (daveg <daveg@sonic.net>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Michael Paesold <mpaesold@gmx.at>)
Re: A smaller default postgresql.conf  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday 19 August 2008 19:12:16 Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, why not just make a one-eighty and say that the default
> postgresql.conf is *empty* (except for whatever initdb puts into it)?

Well, my original implementation of GUC had an empty default configuration 
file, which was later craptaculated to its current form based on seemingly 
popular demand.  I am very happy to work back toward the empty state, and 
there appears to be growing support for that.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Adjusting debug_print_plan to be more useful by default
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures