Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2
Date
Msg-id 20080814220559.GJ4232@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2  (Jan Urbański <j.urbanski@students.mimuw.edu.pl>)
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Urbański wrote:

> Yeah, I got that idea, but then I thought the chances of touching the  
> same element during binary search twice were very small. Especially now  
> when the detoasting occurs only when we hit a text Datum that has the  
> same length as the sought lexeme.
> Still, I can do it if people feel like it.

Actually, in that light it sounds pretty useless.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Urbański
Date:
Subject: Re: gsoc, oprrest function for text search take 2
Next
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: SeqScan costs