Tom Lane wrote:
> On second thought, I think it *could* lead to a visible failure.
> Suppose the OID counter wraps around and the OID that had been used for
> the temporary CLUSTER table gets assigned to a new table. If that table
> needs a toast table, it'll try to create one using the name that is
> already in use. We have defenses against picking an OID that's in use,
> but none for toast table names. So I think it's indeed worth fixing.
Okay, I'll see to it after committing this autovacuum stuff.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
