Am Thursday, 7. August 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> I rather wonder whether -L has any reason to live at all. initdb's
> default is to locate PGSHAREDIR relative to where it finds the backend
> executable, which is consistent with what the backend itself is going
> to do. Is there any scenario where specifying a different location
> wouldn't be broken?
I think the -L option only exists for legacy reasons.
