Re: Must be table owner to truncate? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Must be table owner to truncate?
Date
Msg-id 20080730144602.GQ16005@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Must be table owner to truncate?  (Ragnar <gnari@hive.is>)
List pgsql-general
* Ragnar (gnari@hive.is) wrote:
>
> On mið, 2008-07-30 at 07:36 -0400, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> > At 3:45p -0400 on Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Said Ramirez wrote:
> > > According to the documentation,
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/sql-truncate.html ,
> > > only the owner can truncate a table. Which means the non-owner must
> > > either log in/ switch roles as the owner, or they can just run a DELETE.
> >
> > Well that's interesting.  From a security standpoint, what's the
> > difference between an unqualified DELETE and a TRUNCATE?
>
> lack of triggers and RULEs spring to mind.

It also takes a bigger lock on the table than DELETE, which may or may
not be considered a security issue.  triggers really are the big issue
wrt security and why it deserves to be a seperatelly grantable
permission from delete.

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Francisco Reyes"
Date:
Subject: Re: Connecting to an existing transaction state.
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: Connecting to an existing transaction state.