Re: Recommended RAID for Postgres - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From Michael Monnerie
Subject Re: Recommended RAID for Postgres
Date
Msg-id 200806301740.55080@zmi.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Recommended RAID for Postgres  (Thomas Bräutigam <thomas.braeutigam@nexustelecom.com>)
List pgsql-admin
On Montag, 30. Juni 2008 Thomas Bräutigam wrote:
> Why avoid RAID5?

RAID5 has very poor WRITE performance compared to RAID10, while READ is
nearly the same speed.

If you do not have a "branded" server like HP or IBM, I can recommend
the Areca RAID controllers http://www.areca.com.tw/ their driver is
included in Linux kernel, and they are pretty damn fast. Change the
onboard RAM to 2GB, with the SAS 16 or 24 port controller this is the
way to have fun.

On their website is also benchmarks about different RAID levels, so you
can compare them.

mfg zmi
--
// Michael Monnerie, Ing.BSc    -----      http://it-management.at
// Tel: 0660 / 415 65 31                      .network.your.ideas.
// PGP Key:         "curl -s http://zmi.at/zmi.asc | gpg --import"
// Fingerprint: AC19 F9D5 36ED CD8A EF38  500E CE14 91F7 1C12 09B4
// Keyserver: www.keyserver.net                   Key-ID: 1C1209B4

Attachment

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows xp initdb POSTGRES_SUPERUSERNAME
Next
From: "Rafael Domiciano"
Date:
Subject: Configuring Shared Buffers