Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators
Date
Msg-id 200806191626.58765.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Making the commutator operator where you need it *is* a general solution.

True.  Let me rephrase.  The problem is that when dealing with operator names 
such as ~~ and &&, coming up with commutator operator names will make a mess 
of readability.

> I think there's a syntactic-ambiguity reason why the spec is like that...

OK, that might need to be analyzed.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ANY/SOME/ALL with noncommutable operators
Next
From: David Miller
Date:
Subject: Backend Stats Enhancement Request