Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL
Date
Msg-id 20080612173502.GI5534@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL  ("Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL  ("Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com>)
Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Alex Hunsaker escribió:

> Ok I'm obviously missing something important... Why not Just make the
> various Remove* functions take a list?
>
> I'm not proposing this patch for actual submission, more of a would this work?
> If I'm not missing something glaring obvious Ill go ahead and make the
> rest of the Remove things behave the same way

I don't think there's anything wrong with that in principle.  However,
does your patch actually work?  The changes in expected/ is unexpected,
I think.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: relscan.h split
Next
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Tentative patch for making DROP put dependency info in DETAIL