Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20080530161900.074f218d@iridium.wars-nicht.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 29 May 2008 23:02:56 -0400 Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> Well, yes, but you do know about archive_timeout, right? No need to wait 
> 2 hours.

Then you ship 16 MB binary stuff every 30 second or every minute but
you only have some kbyte real data in the logfile. This must be taken
into account, especially if you ship the logfile over the internet
(means: no high-speed connection, maybe even pay-per-traffic) to the
slave.


Kind regards

--             Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Greg Sabino Mullane"
Date:
Subject: Re: Initial max_connections for initdb on FreeBSD.
Next
From: "Gurjeet Singh"
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL