Mathias Brossard wrote:
> From what I gather from those slides it seems to me that the NTT solution
> is synchronous not asynchronous. In my opinion it's even better, but I do
> understand that others might prefer asynchronous. I'm going to speculate,
> but I would think it should be possible (without a substancial rewrite) to
> support both modes (or even some intermediate modes, like DRBD on Linux).
Well, we already have asynchronous. The whole point is adding synchronous.
