Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 200805292054.m4TKs4O26040@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
David Fetter wrote:
> > What is your justification for denigrating this plan with that?  Or
> > are you merely complaining because we know we won't be all the way
> > there in 8.4?
> 
> Again, just my humble opinion, but given the stated goal, which I
> agree with, I'd say it's worth holding up 8.4 until some kind of
> out-of-the-box replication advances that goal, where Yet Another
> Toolkit Suitable For People Who Are Already Database Kernel Hackers To
> Build Replication Systems On Top Of does not.

I am confused why we would hold 8.4 when no one said we should hold 8.3
because we didn't have built-in replication.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: replication hooks