Robert Treat wrote:
> > The suggestion to have a list of PUGs over training could go the other
> > way too. We could say "Want a PUG?". If they do, they'll click. That is
> > of course fairly silly, but then so is "Want training?", which hides
> > anything interesting and unusual and effectively kills it. If we do that
> > I may as well pack up and just offer one course called "Training".
> >
>
> See, to me the current training blurb is already devoid enough of content that
> I think it is only marginally better than a direct link pointing people
> towards the full training. Adding in a list of PUG meetings helps highlight
> the growing regional presence and international communities for postgres
> around the world. I feel this used to be accomplished by the training
> listing, but there was so much gamesmanship between the training companies
> that we had to mold it into it's current, less than exciting, format. I don't
> expect that gamesmanship from the PUGS.
Agreed. While we need a training page, it is hard to argue we need to
show any training details on the main page.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
