Tom Lane wrote:
> > Just for kicks, I've applied this patch so you, so you get to be on
> > the receiving side of that ;-)
>
> No objection here.
>
> I noticed that you applied the patch to 8.2 as well. It should be
> harmless enough, but we weren't having the problem in 8.2 were we?
> Or am I just confused?
I think the underlying problem is still there, it's just that it
doesn't manifest itself in a crash here. I figured it couldn't hurt to
fix it in that case.
//Magnus
