On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 04:15:18PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Does anyone object to moving the symbol definition part to a file of its
> > own that's inluded by both parser? Or does anyone have a better idea?
>
> AFAIK bison doesn't have an "include" capability, so I'm not sure how
> you plan to make that work?
You found the weak part in my idea. :-)
How about a small perl script that is run before bison and creates the
real grammar file?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
Go VfL Borussia! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!
