Re: Posible planner improvement? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Albert Cervera Areny
Subject Re: Posible planner improvement?
Date
Msg-id 200805211311.25016.albert@sedifa.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posible planner improvement?  (Richard Huxton <dev@archonet.com>)
Responses Re: Posible planner improvement?
List pgsql-performance
A Dimecres 21 Maig 2008, Richard Huxton va escriure:
> Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> > I've got a query similar to this:
> >
> > select * from t1, t2 where t1.id > 158507 and t1.id = t2.id;
> >
> > That took > 84 minutes (the query was a bit longer but this is the part
> > that made the difference) after a little change the query took ~1 second:
> >
> > select * from t1, t2 where t1.id > 158507 and t2.id > 158507 and t1.id =
> > t2.id;
>
> Try posting EXPLAIN ANALYSE SELECT ... for both of those queries and
> we'll see why it's better at the second one.

Right, attached an example of such a difference.



Attachment

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Posible planner improvement?
Next
From: Mark Mielke
Date:
Subject: Re: Posible planner improvement?