Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Sullivan
Subject Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
Date
Msg-id 20080511024156.GA52350@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:55:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> IMHO a utility command should do one easily-explained thing.  The fewer
> options the better.

Sticking to that principle makes for a better-maintained system.  I
agree.  If we want to point out, "You might rename your index
afterwards to make it look like other default primary keys," I have no
objection.

A

-- 
Andrew Sullivan
ajs@commandprompt.com
+1 503 667 4564 x104
http://www.commandprompt.com/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key
Next
From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
Date:
Subject: Re: ecpg localization