choiche of function language was: Re: dynamic procedure call - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
Subject choiche of function language was: Re: dynamic procedure call
Date
Msg-id 20080510091414.08519386@dawn.webthatworks.it
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dynamic procedure call  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: choiche of function language was: Re: dynamic procedure call  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: choiche of function language was: Re: dynamic procedure call  (Steve Atkins <steve@blighty.com>)
Re: choiche of function language was: Re: dynamic procedure call  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
On Sat, 10 May 2008 07:35:36 +0200
"Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:

> your application different execution paths. Generally I can say, so
> plpgsql isn't well language for this games, and better is using
> plperl, plpython or other external language.

It is clear what is at least one of the advantage of plpython or
plperl over plpgsql, but then what are the advantages of plpgsql over
the rest of the crowd other than resembling the language used in
Oracle?

--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: dynamic procedure call
Next
From: "D. Dante Lorenso"
Date:
Subject: Returning RECORD from PGSQL without custom type?