Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Date
Msg-id 200805071550.m47Foih06942@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists  ("Alex Hunsaker" <badalex@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alex Hunsaker wrote:
> A big part of my problem with the split is if there is a discussion
> taking place on -hackers I want to be able to reply to the discussion
> and say "well, here is what I was thinking".  Sending it to -patches
> first waiting for it to hit the archive so I can link to it in my
> reply on -hackers seems pointless and convoluted.

Yea, that is a problem.  Adding a new patch to patches while discussing
on hackers is a receipe for confusion.

> But if thats what you want, thats what ill try to do from now on :)
> 
> For instance the patch Tom reviewed of mine yesterday only -hackers
> was copied, so I maintained that but also added -patches because I was
> sending in a patch...

Yea, sending to both is probably the worst. I would just post to hackers
and mention you sent a new version of the patch to patches --- they
usually show up the same time.

> I think It will be an ongoing problem though especially for new people
> as they probably wont understand the "logical" split...

Yep, I can hardly explain it.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Alex Hunsaker"
Date:
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Next
From: "Matthew T. O'connor"
Date:
Subject: Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists