Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith. - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.
Date
Msg-id 20080425140411.GC16601@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.  (momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian))
Responses Re: pgsql: Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.
List pgsql-committers
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 07:58:32PM +0000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Add embedded usage mention to FAQ, per Greg Smith.

Any chance we can use the active rather than passive voice for that
last hunk?  I'm thinking something like, "...if your embedded
architecture requires the database server to run inside the
application process, you cannot use Postgres and should select a
lighter-weight database solution."

Cheers,
David (the passive voice should be avoided ;)
--
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: eggyknap@pgfoundry.org (User Eggyknap)
Date:
Subject: pllolcode - pllolcode: Make WTF blocks (switch statements) work.
Next
From: momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian)
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Update to remove passive wording from FAQ, David Fetter