Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Based on my observations, there's basically three different workflows a
> patch can follow (assuming the patch gets committed in the end):
>
> Workflow A:
>
> 1. You post patch to pgsql-patches
> 2. a committer picks it up immediately, and commits it.
>
> Workflow B:
>
> 1. You post a patch to pgsql-patches
> 2. You add a link to the wiki page of the next commit fest
> 3. A committer picks up the patch from the wiki page, and commits it
>
> Workflow C:
>
> 1. You post a patch to pgsql-patches
> 2. Bruce adds the patch to the unapplied patches queue after a while
> 3. At the beginning of the next commit fest, Alvaro (with the help from
> others, I hope) goes through the patches queue, and puts a link to the
> wiki page of the next commit fest
> 4. A committer picks up the patch from the wiki page, and commits it
Yep, that's pretty accurate.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
