-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:57:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 10:48 AM, <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 09:48:37AM -0400, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> > > <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > I expect you intend to get at least the hooks in, right?
[...]
> libpqtypes was designed to handle this with our without hooking. (the
> 'hooking' debate was mainly about exactly how libpq and libpqtypes was
> going to be separated).
>
> libpqtypes had a superclassing concept (not much discussed on the
> lists) where you could introduce new type handlers that wrapped
> existing ones and was desgined exactly for things like this.
That sounds cool. So in a way you do have the hooks. That would be the
libpqtypes without the types, no?
> keep an
> eye on our upcoming pgfoundry project.
I sure will.
Thanks
- -- tomás
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFIBaFWBcgs9XrR2kYRAgHNAJ9L59j9eHw0EkZ5Imzg5txAX1lF4ACcCbgS
6bgw0sejoFlCbHXvV55kimo=
=QuvI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
