Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > This isn't really about tools. It's about who wants to put in the
> > day-after-day, year-after-year drudge work to maintain the queue.
> > Whoever wants to do the work can pick their tools...
>
> I still think it would be best if the patch authors did the work. They
> are the ones who care about the patch and want the review, and they're
> in the best position to know what the status of a patch is. Others can
> do it as well of course, in the spirit of a Wiki.
Does that move us in the direction of the patch tracker? That does
raise the bar for patch submitters, though I would catch any patches
that weren't in the tracker.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
