Tom Lane wrote:
> momjian@postgresql.org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Remove mention of the Berkeley origins of the alias "Postgres" ---
> > seems unnecessary to mention in the FAQ, per discussion on IRC.
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement in the least. It makes it
> appear that Postgres is just a randomly chosen abbreviation that
> has no particular historical standing compared to, say, Postgre.
> The previous text made it perfectly clear *why* that shortening
> is preferred over others.
OK, you the second person to say that so I re-added it.
> Why are such politically touchy decisions being taken in an anonymous,
> unarchived forum like IRC, anyway? Especially when what *was*
> being publicly discussed was an entirely different change?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-04/msg00001.php
>
> (Not that I like JD's proposed change better, but at least he
> made it in a reasonably well-read forum.)
I everything related to the alias politically charged. That is a
serious problem.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
