Re: bug in float8in() - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: bug in float8in()
Date
Msg-id 20080402112519.702080e7@mha-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to bug in float8in()  ("Richard Wang" <ruc_wang@hotmail.com>)
Responses Re: bug in float8in()
List pgsql-hackers
Richard Wang wrote:
> I run the following sql statements in linux and get the results:
> postgres=# create table test_double(col1 float8);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# insert into test_double values(1.7976931348623159E308);
> INSERT 0 1
> postgres=# select * from test_double;
>    col1
> ----------
>  Infinity
> (1 row)
> 
> but in windows:
> postgres=# create table test_double(col1 float8);
> CREATE TABLE
> postgres=# insert into test_double values(1.7976931348623159E308);
> ERROR: 
> "17976931348623159000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
> 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000"
> is out of range for type double precision
> postgres=# select * from test_double;
>  col1
> ------
> (0 rows)
> 
> This is a bug, the behavior in windows and linux is not the smae

float relies on platform behavior, AFAIK. You're better off using
numeric if you need to process these values without that.

Float is an approximate datatype. In this case, linux makes a fairly
wild approximation (that it's the same as infinity) whereas windows
says it just can't approximate it. You could argue for either one being
correct, but in the end you just need to use a different datatype if
you need consistent behavior.

> the strtod() function in linux dosen't set errno when dealing with 
> 1.7976931348623159E308 but in windows it does
> How should we improve it?

Not sure we should, really...

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch queue -> wiki (was varadic patch)
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] SHA1 on postgres 8.3