Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > One question: should \df really list *all* nonsystem functions? Or
> > just the ones that are visible in your search path? I'd be
> > inclined to say the second.
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> +1 (although maybe that discussion belongs on -hackers, or even
> -general)
+1. It seems to be what would follow from the principle of least
surprise that this works the same way as \dt does - as close as
possible, that is.
//Magnus
