-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 24 Mar 2008 11:47:20 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > For how often it happens, its worth nothing: I agree 100% with
> > Joshua here, but, if Bruce wants to create a list on his personal
> > domain (which, in itself is a failure point as it requires that
> > *his* domain is not 100% perfect), it doesn't mean that anyone
> > actually has to *use* it ... I know I never will, since there
> > already exist faster, more reliable, contact methods ...
>
> I think we need a more centralized contact system than we have now.
> Personally when I don't get email I am unsure who to contact (because
> community email is down). The email list was a method to centralize
> that. The list of possible contact methods listed confirms my point.
This comes back to defining teams which is already being discussed in
another thread. The people that need to be contacted are the sysadmins
team but we need to know how. Right now, the only people that know how
to get a hold of the sysadmins team, is the sysadmins team :P.
As I said previously, we are attacking the wrong problem. The problem
is not detection (although it could be improved), the problem is not
communication (see my 99% remark).
The problem is one of complexity of environment and resources to manage
that environment. This is already being addressed on the sysadmins list
and I expect that it will be resolved within 2 weeks. Does that sound
about right Marc?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH5852ATb/zqfZUUQRAkJ5AJ9iJF/nz4NmRxztsOzfthc1a3BzYgCeJrHo
chHIksxGEqxbBCPCosPVzYc=
=fLGa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
