Re: Multiple SRF right after SELECT - Mailing list pgsql-hackers
| From | David BOURIAUD |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Multiple SRF right after SELECT |
| Date | |
| Msg-id | 200803191347.06443.david.bouriaud@ac-rouen.fr Whole thread Raw |
| In response to | Re: Multiple SRF right after SELECT (Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>) |
| List | pgsql-hackers |
Le mercredi 19 mars 2008, Albert Cervera i Areny a écrit :
Hi !
> A Dimecres 19 Març 2008, Nikolay Samokhvalov va escriure:
> > 2. Why the query above provides 4 rows, not 2*4=8? Actually, that's
> > interesting -- I can use this query to find l.c.m. But it's defenetely
> > not that I'd expect before my try...
>
> 2*4 = 8:
>
> select * from generate_series(1, 2) a, generate_series(1, 4) b;
If you launch the above query, you just get what you would get if you would do
a select from two tables without joining them at all...
So, you get the cartesian product of the two ensembles.
>
> Can't tell you about the expected behaviour in the query you provided
> though.
I've made few tests with the primary query, and indeed it is strange
behavoiour. Consider the following :
select generate_series(1, 3), generate_series(1, 4);generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+----------------- 1 | 1 2 | 2 3 |
3 1 | 4 2 | 1 3 | 2
1 | 3 2 | 4 3 | 1 1 |
2 2 | 3 3 | 4
which is not fully readeable but if you sort things, you get exactly the same
as what you mentionned before :
select generate_series(1, 3), generate_series(1, 4) order by 1,2;generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+----------------- 1 | 1 1 | 2 1 |
3 1 | 4 2 | 1 2 | 2
2 | 3 2 | 4 3 | 1 3 |
2 3 | 3 3 | 4
So far it is clear, but if you just make things so that the the number of rows
returned by one call to generate_series is a multiple of the other, the
result is truncated :
select generate_series(1, 3), generate_series(1, 6) order by 1,2;generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+----------------- 1 | 1 1 | 4 2 |
2 2 | 5 3 | 3 3 | 6
provides the same strange result as initialy discovered, and
select generate_series(1, 6), generate_series(1, 3) order by 2,1;generate_series | generate_series
-----------------+----------------- 1 | 1 4 | 1 2 |
2 5 | 2 3 | 3 6 | 3
provides the same, mirrored. So, it could be a bug somewhere.
Hoping that it will be of any help...
Regards.
>
> --
> Albert Cervera i Areny
> http://www.NaN-tic.com
pgsql-hackers by date: