Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today
Date
Msg-id 200803172252.m2HMqq325097@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PG 7.3 is five years old today  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Added to TODO:
  o Remove pre-7.3 pg_dump code that assumes pg_depend does not exit


---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Whether there's any need to support the old protocol in the server depends on
> > whether there are any clients out there which use it which is harder to
> > determine and not affected by whether Postgres 7.3 is still around.
> 
> Right.  There's really not much to be gained by dropping it on the
> server side anyway.  libpq might possibly be simplified by a useful
> amount, but on the other hand we probably want to keep its current
> structure for the inevitable v4 protocol.
> 
> Another area where we might think about dropping some stuff is pg_dump.
> If we got rid of the requirement to support dumps from pre-7.3 servers
> then it could assume server-side dependencies exist, and lose all the
> code for trying to behave sanely without 'em.
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
> 
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: New style of hash join proposal
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Better error message for select_common_type()