Kynn Jones escribió:
> I'm leaning towards the re-design option, primarily because I really don't
> really understand the consequences of cranking up max_locks_per_transaction.
> E.g. Why is its default value 2^6, instead of, say, 2^15?
It's because it (partly) defines how much shared memory the server will
use.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
