-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 22:03:35 +0100
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>
> Well, that is not "general". Name it pgsql-us-usergroup or something
> then. The pgsql-eu-general list isn't general either. It's a
> mistake. Let's be more precise and accurate in the future.
Peter if this was a concern for you, I wish you would have brought it
up sooner... We have:
pgsql-fr-generale
pgsql-ru-general
pgsql-tr-genel
pgsql-eu-general
pgsql-it-generale
and now we are requesting pgsql-us-general.
So either they are all mistakes, or?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of
Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2um5ATb/zqfZUUQRAqemAJ0XFWkm38bgjDZLnXopYwLnRd88+ACfczD5
aweBVjX+tfoWlg0AczB75s8=
=5/eO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
