-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 01:09:59 -0300
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> wrote:
> > I am confused. The eu association is pgsql-eu-general (which is why
> > we asked for pgsql-us-general. Or is this wrong?
>
> pgeu-board
O.k. so pgus-board makes sense. Cool.
>
> pgsql-eu-general is a regional group, not the association ... if that
> isn't the case, then that needs to be renamed to pgeu-general also ...
My understanding is that pgsql-eu-general == postgresql.eu == the
association. I could be wrong.. Of course if I am, the eu-general
list has been way off topic for the last couple of months :P Dave,
Magnus, Ads?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of
Dolphins
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH2ftgATb/zqfZUUQRAqCeAJ0dql/iEew0TS0fV7+OjOhuukdJyQCgmOtx
qyKTtdid4tPdUTpjhc80mF4=
=hBu9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
