Tom Lane wrote:
> plpgsql does not consider standard_conforming_strings --- it still uses
> backslash escaping in its function bodies regardless. Since the
> language itself is not standardized, I see no particular reason that
> standard_conforming_strings should govern it.
I think plpgsql should behave either consistently with the rest of PostgreSQL
or with Oracle, which it is copied from.
> I believe the reason for
> not changing it was that it seemed too likely to break existing
> functions, with potentially nasty consequences if they chanced to be
> security definers.
Is this actually true or did we just forget it? :-)
