Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow
Date
Msg-id 20080310165641.333d5a3e@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow  (Miguel Arroz <arroz@guiamac.com>)
Responses Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow  (Miguel Arroz <arroz@guiamac.com>)
List pgsql-performance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:46:10 +0000
Miguel Arroz <arroz@guiamac.com> wrote:
        tty             ad4              ad6             cpu
>   tin tout  KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s  us ni sy in id
>     0   60 33.48 449 14.66   0.00   0  0.00  11  0  3  0 86
>     0  180 16.85 599  9.87   0.00   0  0.00   1  0  1  0 98
>     0   60 55.37 455 24.58   0.00   0  0.00  25  0  4  1 69
>     0   60 49.83 376 18.28   0.00   0  0.00  18  0  5  1 76
>     0   60 29.86 363 10.58   0.00   0  0.00   3  0  0  1 96
>     0   60 36.21 365 12.90   0.00   0  0.00  12  0  3  1 84
>     0   60 33.13 353 11.41   0.00   0  0.00   2  0  2  0 96
>     0   60 39.47 345 13.28   0.00   0  0.00  16  0  3  0 80
>     0   60 40.48 363 14.34   0.00   0  0.00   8  0  2  0 89
>     0   60 30.91 397 11.97   0.00   0  0.00   5  0  2  0 93
>     0   60 18.21 604 10.75   0.00   0  0.00   5  0  2  0 93
>     0   60 48.65 359 17.04   0.00   0  0.00  20  0  6  0 74
>     0   60 32.91 375 12.04   0.00   0  0.00  10  0  4  0 86
>     0   60 35.81 339 11.84   0.00   0  0.00   3  0  2  0 96
>     0   60 33.38 394 12.83   0.00   0  0.00  11  0  4  0 85
>     0   60 34.40 313 10.51   0.00   0  0.00   4  0  2  0 93
>     0   60 45.65 358 15.94   0.00   0  0.00  19  0  7  0 74
>     0   60 37.41 309 11.28   0.00   0  0.00   3  0  2  0 95
>     0   60 32.61 447 14.22   0.00   0  0.00  10  0  3  1 86
>     0   60 17.11 516  8.63   0.00   0  0.00   1  0  1  0 98
> 
>    There's surely a lot of disk activity going on. With this
> figures, I could have written some hundred gigabytes during the
> query execution! Something is definitely not right here.


Well the above says you are getting ~ 10-15MB/s a second performance.
What is the disk subsystem you have. Also note that the duration
probably went up because you didn't vacuum between tests.

What version of PostgreSQL (I missed it).

Joshua D. Drake 



- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
      PostgreSQL political pundit | Mocker of Dolphins

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFH1cq5ATb/zqfZUUQRAhVvAKCfQk4Mg6qLNQfc6uyiI2TBSbkThACeK/5k
Tgc9ltxoOvnTMzKG2hG/4LY=
=Tm4N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Miguel Arroz
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow
Next
From: Miguel Arroz
Date:
Subject: Re: UPDATE 66k rows too slow