Tom Lane wrote:
> "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > The first commitfest has been on for about a week now, but I haven't
> > seem much festivities going on.
>
> Yeah, we are a bit behind on starting it :-(. Bruce was traveling
> until the end of February and is still not caught up on updating
> his list of open patches. And I had some Red Hat responsibilities
> to take care of, as well as personal matters, and was happy to let
> it slip a few days. But we need to get on with it.
>
> > Do we plan to drain Bruce's patch queue completely during this
> > commitfest? Or the items on the developer wiki TODO:PatchStatus list?
>
> Right at the moment the raw data is still in Bruce's patch queue.
> It's becoming increasingly obvious that that isn't going to work;
> we can't have one man being a complete bottleneck for the entire
> process. I concur with your other suggestion to try to move to
> a wiki-based patch list, though it's unclear to me just how we
> should manage that. I think I'd prefer a small number of people
> (but more than just Bruce) responsible for updating the queue.
Consider I am collecting all our open items from the past 10 months.
Even when I am done the patch queue is going to be a load of work ---
take a look at what is there now.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
