-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 12:29:13 -0300
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > Right at the moment the raw data is still in Bruce's patch queue.
> > > It's becoming increasingly obvious that that isn't going to work;
> > > we can't have one man being a complete bottleneck for the entire
> > > process. I concur with your other suggestion to try to move to
> > > a wiki-based patch list, though it's unclear to me just how we
> > > should manage that. I think I'd prefer a small number of people
> > > (but more than just Bruce) responsible for updating the queue.
> >
> > Consider I am collecting all our open items from the past 10
> > months. Even when I am done the patch queue is going to be a load
> > of work --- take a look at what is there now.
>
> We need storage of patches _outside_ our current patch queue.
O.k. this is ugly, probably shouldn't be done, and I may be flamed into
oblivion for this but since we aren't using some kind of bug tracker
that will detach the patches etc...
Have we considered a read only imap server with a patches account that
anyone can attach to with their email client to pull patches?
Or, just a web-email interface that would allow someone to download the
attachment?
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH0W/pATb/zqfZUUQRAsBmAJ9afIUgsuN+26zjbdk8MHcfX9755QCeISM6
zxcu/CxQYN2ujjovJXrm2H8=
=E+FF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
