Re: partitioning using dblink - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: partitioning using dblink
Date
Msg-id 200803031718.m23HIFF27027@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioning using dblink  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: partitioning using dblink  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-general
Tom Lane wrote:
> Scara Maccai <m_lists@yahoo.it> writes:
> > I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any
> > errors,
>
> You should have.  The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> sequence of operations that avoids those checks.  Turning a table into a
> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.

Is this a TODO?  Seems so.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Collin
Date:
Subject: Re: Connect to postgres from a dynamic IP
Next
From: Andrei Kovalevski
Date:
Subject: Re: Connect to postgres from a dynamic IP