Robert Lor wrote:
> Please find the patch attached per this thread
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-02/msg00912.php
Another thing that is concerning me about this new approach is the way the
probes are named. For example, we'd now have a call
POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_ACQUIRE()
in the code. This does not say we are *tracing* lock aquisition, but it looks
like a macro that actually acquires a lock.
I understand that these probe names follow some global naming scheme. Is it
hard to change that? I'd feel more comfortable with, say,
(D)TRACE_POSTGRESQL_LWLOCK_ACQUIRE().
Comments?
