-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:17:10 -0800
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > I would personally rather keep it simple, hard core, and data
> > shoving as possible without any issue with scheduling etc..
> >
>
> Just a thought. After it's actually implemented it won't be hard to
> see if it's a win.
Yep :) but as a note:
I am currently testing on the data set that is giving us all these
issues. Previously we were pushing ~ 22G an hour over a single thread.
I am currently pushing ~ 28G every 16 minutes over 6 threads.
With 30-40% IO wait.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director | PostgreSQL political pundit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFHwyToATb/zqfZUUQRAsDzAJ0cZEujQIW1SQ9Wd1nd1jWRVWy09ACgpryh
SJENqCnmwKoSMF5fSHBRtsg=
=hVeo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
