Re: ts_headline - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Stephen Davies
Subject Re: ts_headline
Date
Msg-id 200802231113.29647.scldad@sdc.com.au
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ts_headline  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
Responses Re: ts_headline
List pgsql-general
As it turns out, all I needed was in the doco but the key element - the first
config arg to ts_headline - was not in any of the examples so I missed it.

Would it be possible for ts_headline to work with the pre-parsed ts_vector?

I see references to future plans for phrase searching in ts. Is there a date
for this?

Cheers and thanks,
Stephen
Davies


On Friday 22 February 2008 22:54, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008, Stephen Davies wrote:
> > Hmmmm!
> > I think I now understand the ts position better, thank you.
> >
> > Part of my problem has been that I am used to the functionality of Open
> > Text's LCS (aka BASIS) product which handles text differently.
> >
> > It includes the position (and context) information in the index and does
> > "remember" how the text was parsed so does not need to reparse to insert
> > hit navigation tags nor need pointers as to how to parse queries. (It
> > also supports phrase searching.)
> >
> > Now that I have a better understanding of ts, I think I will be able to
> > make it do at least most of what I hoped for.
>
> I'm wondering if it was not described in the text search documentation :)
>
> > Thank you again for your help with this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Stephen Davies
> >
> > On Friday 22 February 2008 20:45, Richard Huxton wrote:
> >> Stephen Davies wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, my link to the box with the test database is down due to
> >>> lack of maintenance by our local telco (Telstra) but I think that I
> >>> also missed the optional config arg to ts_headline.
> >>>
> >>> The lack of link also means that I cannot confirm your findings but
> >>> your logic looks good.
> >>
> >> Looks like ALTER DATABASE SET default_text_config='english' is what you
> >> need.
> >>
> >>> It begs the question, however, as to why ts-headline needs to reparse
> >>> the raw text.
> >>
> >> It needs to line up tsvector lexemes with actual characters in the text.
> >> The tsvector is missing punctuation, any stopwords (the, it, a) as well
> >> as being stemmed (if your dictionary does that).
> >>
> >> Also, it's looking for a short span of words that provide the best
> >> match. That might not be a complete match of course, and is different to
> >> how you'd normally look to use a tsvector.
> >>
> >>> At least in my case, I am using a trigger to parse the combination of
> >>> Title and Abstract to a ts_vector field in the table row (as suggested
> >>> in 12.2.2 and 12.4.3 in the doco) so that the ts_vector is already
> >>> available to ts_headline.
> >>>
> >>> If ts_headline had the ability to use that pre-parsed ts_vector, my
> >>> problem would never have arisen - and the performance of ts_headline
> >>> would be improved.
> >>
> >> Maybe. It would still have to parse the text to some degree though, just
> >> to get the original words & punctuation into the headline.
>
>      Regards,
>          Oleg
> _____________________________________________________________
> Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru),
> Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
> Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
> phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83

--
========================================================================
This email is for the person(s) identified above, and is confidential to
the sender and the person(s).  No one else is authorised to use or
disseminate this email or its contents.

Stephen Davies Consulting                            Voice: 08-8177 1595
Adelaide, South Australia.                             Fax: 08-8177 0133
Computing & Network solutions.                       Mobile:0403 0405 83

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Steve Atkins
Date:
Subject: Re: Queries w/ "computed" table names? (eval in Pg?)
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL's hashing function?